The Tour de France, a spectacle of cycling prowess, has long captivated audiences, but it's not just about the victories. Tadej Pogacar, the current champion, is learning that the adoration of fans can quickly turn to scorn, especially when it comes to heroic defeats. The French public's peculiar fascination with underdogs and their valiant struggles has a long history, dating back to the 1960s rivalry between Jacques Anquetil and Raymond Poulidor. This dynamic, often referred to as the MJPP principle, has shaped the perception of Tour de France winners, creating a complex relationship between athletes and their fans.
Anquetil, a master of time-trial stages, and Poulidor, the warm-hearted peasant, embodied this dichotomy. While Anquetil's clinical approach made him unreadable to the French press, Poulidor's valiant failures resonated with the public, making him the most popular athlete in France. This dynamic set the tone for future generations of Tour de France champions, influencing their public image and the way they are perceived.
The MJPP principle is further exemplified by the case of Thibaut Pinot, who, in 2023, made a heroic solo attack through the Vosges, only to be chased down by the dominant UAE team, led by Pogacar. This scenario illustrates the French public's love for underdogs and their struggle against overwhelming odds, a sentiment that has endured over the years.
However, the rise of doping in the 1990s and 2000s added a layer of complexity to this dynamic. The ethical implications of Tour stars being perceived as clean and unquestioned in their victories became a significant concern. Lance Armstrong, a prolific winner, faced brickbats and urine when his doping was exposed, even before he was caught. Alberto Contador, in 2011, was booed during the team presentation when his clenbuterol positive was under inquiry.
This shift in public sentiment has created a challenge for modern Tour de France champions, like Pogacar, who must navigate the fine line between charisma and ethical integrity. The French public's desire for heroes who win with grace and humility, while also competing and smiling like Poulidor, presents an impossible triangle for some. Pogacar's dominance and charisma may earn him admiration, but the public's expectations for ethical conduct and transparency could also lead to scrutiny and criticism.
In conclusion, the Tour de France is not just a race; it's a cultural phenomenon that reflects the French public's unique relationship with victory and defeat. The MJPP principle and the impact of doping have shaped the perception of Tour de France winners, creating a complex dynamic that continues to evolve. As Pogacar navigates the challenges of defending his title, he must understand the delicate balance between his dominance and the public's expectations, a balance that could determine his legacy in the eyes of the French cycling fans.
